Dez aforismos perenes do caminho espiritual, para os nosso dias.

 

                                                  

                                       Aforismos

1- Mesmo o espírito, subtilísimo  mistério, manifesta-se segundo ritmos, que desconhecemos. 

Isto é, embora o espírito seja supra-temporal, em certos aspectos,  determinados pelas contagens  humanas e a dependência da luz do sol, ele manifesta-se em nós com periocidade, e de acordo ainda com combinações de energias, raios e influências merecidas.

2. A paciência perante os vales é condição para se chegar às montanhas.

Isto é, temos de sofrer as contrariedades, dores, demoras, esforços, oposições com calma  para merecemos ascender na montanha do espírito e do Divino e ficarmos mais expostos à sua Luz. 

3- O desenvolvimento interno exige treino, concentração, esforço, perseverança mas o espírito sopra quando quer.

Isto é, tens o direito e dever de trabalhar,  praticar, de orar mas os eflúvios da graça espiritual e divina só chegam pela livre dádiva ou graça do Alto.

4- A responsabilidade de ensinar é muito grande e em geral é ignorada.

Por isso eis tanta gente a vender mercadoria fraca como valiosa, por vezes até com consequências negativas em tantos que são apanhados, em geral movida pela necessidade de fazer dinheiro, ou de engrandecer o ego. Tanta gente fanatizada, política ou esotericamente, limitada e enganando o próximo...

5- Aperta a mão, ve, escuta e recebe a informação ou o ensinamento de quem confias mesmo.

Só devemos aprender e receber de quem sentimos que sabe, que vale, que é, e que com quem temos afinidades e intuímos poder haver um trabalho de aprofundamento mútuo da verdade. Senão estás a envenenar-te.

6- A menos que sejas competente para julgares um assunto, não critiques, não clames. 

Evita aumentares a confusão geral e o espírito crítico negativo. Tenta transmitir as críticas como contributos agradáveis ou pelo menos claros para a verdade.

7- O aforismo pitagórico "1, 2". significa que a perfeição só existe no mundo espiritual e que a dualidade é a condição do mundo psico-físico.

Está portanto preparado para todo o tipo de conflitos e lutas, aprende a suportares os ataques e a desprenderes-te do que se passa, embora esforçando-te pelo melhor que possas dar, gerar, receber.

8- Um dos segredo da oração está em criares uma imagem do que queres, e aguardares que o mundo espiritual ou a providência divina  a abençoe, mas sem estares a evaporar tal molde com dúvidas.

Fé, confiança, esperança, e não duvidarmos de que o que  pedimos merece acontecer ou ser recebido. Pensa e Age pelo bem da Humanidade e não por um grupo, elite ou raça...

9- Não caias em exaltações ou repulsões sentimentais e imaginativas, e antes seja dum lúcido, simples e são interior que brotem as tuas emanações, ou mesmo o fogo amor divino. 

Isto é, tem o teu interior centrado no coração e tingido das core que te caracterizam e recebes nas tuas meditações. Acolhe as pessoas nessa aura e nos diálogos  que travarem deixa que o amor, a sabedoria e a força emanem, para  que dissipem as trevas do mal, hoje tão visíveis no sionismo e imperialismo agressores do sagrado Irão e dos outros povos vizinhos. 

10- Purifica-te diariamente, religa-te verticalmente e bate à porta ou abre o coração com aspiração e fé.

Lava-te, limpa-te e purifica-te com a água colorida e misericordiosa,  respira fundo e harmoniza-te, esforça-te e inflama-te com o fogo, ora, medita e contempla, ajuda e sacrifica-te, aspira, curva-te e adora e o teu corpo espiritual despertará, e alinhar-te-ás com os mensageiros do Alto, com o Espírito, com a Divindade... 

Teachings from the Al Qadariyah tarika, given by the sheik Shah Muhammad Badi-Ul-Alam. Bengal, 1914.

                                                    

Human nature is so subtle, complex, diverse and  mysterious in its intimacy or bottom, causality and dynamism, that it is difficult to categorise it with precision but, over the centuries, many proposals have been formed, and we can mention the most easily accepted ones: animal, human, and psychic nature. Or physical, psycho-animic and spiritual, each person having developed more or less of each. Or still, physical, subtle, spiritual and divine.

A Bengali spiritual teacher, Shah Muhammad Badi-Ul-Alam, from the Iranian lineage of the Qadariyah order (founded by Abdul Qadir Jilani), being a disciple of Mouland Muklisar Rahman and his son Moulana Muhammad Abdul Hai, presented in a very substantial book printed in Bengal in 1914, a division worthy of consideration: animal, satanic, angelic and divine, which almost reminds us of Pico della Mirandola in his "Oration on the Dignity of Man" (which the unforgettable portuguese master of Humanism and Utopia, J. V. Pina Martins so appreciated and cited, and the way he characterises those levels is quite instructive. Let's listen to him:

«The nourishment for the development of Animal Character lies in eating, sleeping, lighting and killing, and in satisfying other animal propensities. If you think that you are only an animal and have no other functions to discharge, then your plain duty is to keep yourself engaged, day and night, in satisfying these animal cravings, i. e. in eating, sleeping and fighting to your heart's content &c.
The nourishment for Satanic Character lies in cheating, intriguing and doing evils to others. If you think that you are originally a satan, then your plain duty is to remain, day and night, engaged in doing mischief to other creatures of God, and in misguiding the world by your intrigues ; and to make yourself the commander of the army of Hell, so that you may reign there. [So visible in our days specially in Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth, Benjamim Netanyahu and Givr.]
The nourishment for Angelic Character lies in remaining constantly engaged in submissive prayers and dutiful services to God (or Allah), and in the blissful vision of that vast, beautiful and etherial creation, known as "the Spiritual Region." Anger, avarice, lust and other animal passions and evil propensities, and the intrigues of Satan, have no existence in that pure and peaceful sphere. If you think that you are originally an angel, then your plain duty is to pay no attention to the cravings of the two preceding characters ; but to keep them under proper control and subjugation, and to try always to revive the Angelic Character by means of peaceful prayers and faithful services, so that you may enjoy the blissful and enchanting vision and companionship of the Spiritual World, called the Behesht (paradise). And the nourishment for Divine Character lies in acquiring Divine attributes which are classified in the ninety-nine attributive names of Divinity, called Asmad-i-Sifat or Asmad-i-Husud and in the love for, and in charming vision and companionship of, the Great Allah or Divinity Himself. 

Animal, Satanic and Angelic characters have no access to that Holy, Sublime and Divine environment. If you think that you have come from that Divine Personality or Essence, then your plain duty is to pay no attention to the three preceding characters, but to keep them under proper control, and find out the way to the acquirement of the knowledge of the Divine Being, the Great Allah, in his three spheres or stages of existence: (1) Af, al, actions, (2) Sifat, Attributes e (3) Zat, Essence. 

By such a knowdlege you will be able to enjoy the vision and companionship of the great Allah (or God) and to acquire His attributes. On this point a poet saint says: "Put your first step on your own self (by renouncing your personanlity) nad next step in the streer of your Friend (Allah)"»

Let's strive to further develop angelic qualities and divine attributes and be creatively and corageously on the spiritual path towards the Spirit and the Divine Being!

Easter: The Central Event of the Spiritual Realm. Alexander Dugin on Logos, Faith, Iran, and the collapse of Western strategy. With some annotations by...14-4-26.

                                      

Easter: The Central Event of the Spiritual Realm Alexander Dugin on faith, Iran, and the collapse of Western strategy. 14-4- 26.

Conversation with Alexander Dugin on the Sputnik TV program Escalation.

Host: Yesterday we had a great and beautiful celebration—indeed, more than one: we marked Cosmonautics Day and another of the brightest holidays of the year. I suggest we begin with this very topic. Let us talk about the importance of these events and their impact, including on the global level.

Alexander Dugin: You know, as I stood at the solemn liturgy and the Paschal matins, I kept thinking about the content of what we celebrate. Seeing so many people in the churches, inspired by this joy, I found myself asking a strange question: do we even understand—ordinary people who come to have their Easter cakes blessed—the meaning of this feast today? Do its meanings truly reach us?
I decided to listen closely to every sung and proclaimed word, setting aside my theological knowledge and philosophical concepts. And I began to feel somewhat uneasy. We hear: “Christ has overcome death.” Yet death still exists. We hear: “Christ has brought peace.” Yet humanity wages war just as it did two thousand years ago. We hear about truth, yet delusions only grow more rigid.
It turned out that all these messages are addressed to a person who, by default, is supposed to possess a deep spiritual culture and an understanding of a reality that extends far beyond the body. The Good News of Christ consisted in the fact that the spiritual world is structured differently from how Old Testament humanity understood it. But why was this such a shock two thousand years ago?
Because the Jewish tradition also shaped a spiritual world, yet it was governed by different ideas about the fate after death. It was believed that the souls of all people, including the forefather Adam, inevitably entered Sheol, into hell. The distinction between God and the world seemed insurmountable, no matter how one might strive. And this image of a closed spiritual world was pierced and overcome by the coming of Christ. One reality gave way to another—an open one. And this realization is extraordinarily important for us today.
Everything we encounter in the Church is connected precisely with this: with the fact that, through Christ, His suffering on the cross, and His resurrection on the third day, another spiritual world was opened to us. This is a revolutionary religious revelation, yet it is addressed to people who are not merely aware of the existence of this world, but who feel at home in it with confidence and maturity. To those who understand what it can be and rejoice that, through Christ’s sacrifice, it has become precisely that for us.
However, looking at the beautiful people in the church—young people, those of middle age, the elderly with open eyes and hearts—I realized one thing. With the exception of a rooted, practicing flock possessing spiritual skills, the majority present hardly understands the essence of what is taking place. Even if everything were explained in modern Russian, one would have to begin from the very basics. To understand what is being sung in the Paschal service, why we “drink the new drink,” and why and where we go “with joyful feet,” requires an enormous spiritual culture. In the past, its foundations were given even to the simplest estates, to the peasantry, whereas today we have largely lost this culture. We have lost the ability to grasp even the basic meanings of this great feast. [Older times there was not also so much more understanding of deeper levels, or to be more precisely, experience of the subtle levels of te spirit and of the Christ.]
                            

I had hoped that in his Paschal message His Holiness the Patriarch would attempt to bring these meanings closer to the people. We are now at a turning point in history: people are increasingly turning to religion, to questions of God, the soul, immortality, and the end of the world [Probably few people think in the end of the world, only the ones more zealots]—especially when there is so much death and suffering around us. And although the messages were written with great spiritual elevation, they were texts of theologians for theologians. The image of “spring in the spirit,” proposed by the Patriarch, is beautiful, but what does it mean for the ordinary person? [I think it has still very deep energetic and awakening ressonance in the unconscious colective soul.]
For a churched individual, whose daily life is filled with prayer, this message is meaningful. Yet for the modern Russian person—post-Soviet, shaped by the liberal era—this theological layer does not resonate automatically. We often ignore it in sermons or confine ourselves to proper moral instruction. I do not condemn anyone, but I saw a vast deficiency in our existence: the absence in society of an adequate understanding of the spiritual world. [Indeed, even if  outside the Church many esoteric groups have it, and work it.]

Host: Allow me to suggest: perhaps many people come to church and listen to the service, as it were, beyond words. That is, they do not focus on the specific meanings of what is being said, but perceive the very melodiousness, the calm that is conveyed through these prayers, the voices of the priests performing the chants. Perhaps it is not always about the words, but about an inner sense of this very melody?

Alexander Dugin: Yet precisely in the Gospel read at Pascha it is said that in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God, and through this Word all things were made. In the Greek original, this is the Logos. So how can we, considering ourselves Christians and coming to the Church of Christ, which is built around the incarnation of the Word, be content merely with melodies, intonations, or kind facial expressions? There is a deep contradiction in this. [No, because Logos is also rythm, harmony, love] The Logos is thought, the Logos is spirit, and God is spirit.
When we are told about love, it is a particular kind of love connected to the spiritual world. In the Greek original, the term used is agape, which in the Christian context can never be applied to carnal love. [May be it can: carnal love can be also sacred, agape...] This word denotes an entirely different level of relationship; therefore, even the very concept of “love,” which constantly resounds in the church, requires special interpretation.
Of course, it is good that people come, that they enter the church at least once a year to affirm their faith, even if it is still in its infancy.[Strong statement...] This is very important, and I do not criticize anyone. I only want to speak about the enormous void in our lives where the spiritual world ought to be. For the entire Good News, the traditions, the sacraments, the sermons, and the prayers—all of this is addressed precisely to it.
Many today are entirely unaware of the existence of this world, or no one has reminded them of it. How are they to listen? How are they to apply it? One can, of course, say: there is no need to interpret or understand anything, simply come—and that is already good. And I agree with this. It is better to go to church and listen to the truth proclaimed by the priests in the most uncritical manner. Even if you do not understand it at all, accept it as absolute truth and follow it with minimal reflection.[Even if you don't understand it at all levels, what indeed very difficult, accept it in what make sense to you, and  better if you reflect a bit, meditate it a bit.], 
However, the nature of the human being is to be a rational soul, unlike, for example, a monkey, a blade of grass, or the flowers now in bloom. Perhaps Christ is addressed to them as well, [Perhaps the Logos passes through them also..] but first and foremost He calls to the thinking soul—that is, to us. Even if we consider ourselves simple people, we are still thinking souls. Man was not conceived and created as an idiot: he bears within himself that dimension to which the message of Christ is addressed at its deepest level. This message is intelligent; it is bound up with immense realities of the spiritual world.
And this spiritual world, from which the Church begins, [May be the johannite church, the mystical church...] has receded into the shadows. It has not disappeared anywhere; it remains primary, but in our everyday life it plays almost no role. We manage to reduce all the events of life to rational, material causes and effects, overlooking what is most important. Now is the time to return constantly and everywhere to this spiritual dimension. Without it, we will explain nothing: neither in politics, nor in society, nor in the economy. Everything will fall apart. The spiritual world is what connects people with one another; it binds the people and the authorities, time and space, generations and families. [Here Alexander Dugin should have given more aspects of his propedeutic to the spiritual world.]
If marriage has no sacred meaning, no one will respect it or consider it indissoluble. Only when we understand that the family is a sacrament, and explain how it is connected with the soul, with God, and with the resurrection of the dead, do the priest’s words—“the two shall become one flesh”—acquire power. Without this explanation, our society will lose its persuasiveness. We will not be able to explain what we are fighting for, what civilization we represent, and what we are struggling against. The understanding of the spiritual world in Christianity is ceasing to be something optional or secondary.
This is not an ideology or an artificial intellectual construct. What we are speaking about is the recollection of a vast and decisive reality that we have forgotten and lost. It lives within the Church, and it is vital for us to restore it. Easter takes place regardless of whether we understand it or not—that is its greatness. Yet in order to be fully human within a fully realized state, we must accept the will of God and acknowledge the invisible world with its absolute and eternal foundations. This is absolutely essential.[This seems very intelectual: who knows exactly the will of God? And more than "acknowledge the invisible world with its absolute", we must feel it, see it, understand it, the little that our spiritual organs or senses can.]

Host: You emphasized the great significance of Easter. In that connection, and within the broader discussion of geopolitics, I would like to ask: how does the celebration of the Resurrection of Christ affect relations, for example, between Orthodox Christians and Catholics? How do they conduct dialogue in this context? Do we see any kind of de-escalation or rapprochement at such moments, or, on the contrary, does the divide deepen because of differences in calendars and traditions of celebration?

Alexander Dugin: Our relations with Catholics and Protestants can only be described and properly understood if we begin by examining the very nature of our faith—its essence. This is not a matter of conventions, nor of one side inventing one ideology and the other inventing another. In reality, the schism of the Church in the eleventh century effectively predetermined the existence of two antagonistic civilizations whose paths diverged irreversibly.
To explain who Catholics and Protestants are—or what the modern anti-Christian West represents as a whole—we must first understand who we ourselves are. These are not accidental developments. Originally, we were all parts of a single Greco-Roman Christian civilization. After the division, however, we sought to preserve the original orientation, a fidelity to the sources, even if something was lost along the way. The Western world, Western Catholicism, and Western medieval civilization, by contrast, turned away from that path.
Moving in a different direction, Western civilization began to undergo a kind of mutation. At first, this manifested at the level of religious doctrine; then came the Reformation, which ultimately distorted the original understanding of Christianity. In modern times, the very principles on which the West was once founded began to be directly dismantled. Beginning in the sixteenth century—through the Enlightenment, materialism, and the Great French Revolution—everything Christian was simply cast aside by this so-called “Christian” West.
Today, a profound civilizational abyss lies between us and the modern West. When we say, “We are Orthodox, they are Catholics or Protestants,” we must first understand that contemporary Western civilization has become anti-Christian. The status of Catholics and Protestants within their own societies today differs radically from what it once was.
This historical path that has separated us from the West is a kind of spiritual map, a sacred history. It is no less important than the history of the Old Testament or the Early Church. We must be historical beings. When we call ourselves Russian Orthodox people, we must see before us the entirety of our civilizational journey. And we must perceive it not as a matter of chance or historical accident, but as a manifestation of the providence of the eternal God—the God of the Trinity, Jesus Christ — concerning our people and other civilizations.
All of this demands serious study [multireligious...] which today has become an absolute necessity. Without understanding this path, we will not be able to comprehend our place in the world or the responsibility that has been placed upon us.

Host: We have spoken about religion, and of course one must ask: what is happening with this in the West? We see that Donald Trump increasingly turns to religious themes. At times groups of pastors come to him; at others, individual preachers. At the same time, there has been unexpectedly sharp criticism of the Pope, who is reproached for failing to support U.S. actions in Iran. And most unexpectedly of all, there was a post on Truth Social in which Trump was portrayed almost in the image of Jesus Christ, raising the dead. [Interesting vision or hermeneutic of the host...]  How should all of this be understood?

                                 

Alexander Dugin: This is, of course, an absolute scandal. At first it was said that the image was Iranian propaganda. But I conducted my own investigation, consulted artificial intelligence tools, and was provided with links to the original post from Trump himself. What is most striking about the image is that he stands in a blasphemous, sacrilegious pose, while horned demons fly above him. This is not simply an appeal to religion—it is an appeal to something directly opposed to Christianity. [Very interesting hermeneutic of Dugin, seeing horned demons where I see more be airplanes and bombs]
Many have now recalled that during his second inauguration Trump did not place his hand on the Bible. People have begun to look more closely at his circle: these are far from being merely pastors, but representatives of a specific current within Protestant fundamentalism—dispensationalism. These individuals believe that the purpose of America is to follow completely the interests of the State of Israel. At the core of their interpretation lies the idea of the chosenness of non-Christian Jews.
Add to this the practice of so-called glossolalia—“speaking in tongues.” The head of Trump’s religious office, Paula White [a snake oil womanseller] cries out like someone possessed in a non-existent language, claiming that a spirit speaks through her. Traditional Christians, who were initially part of Trump’s coalition—particularly Catholics such as Carrie Bolles [Carrie Prejean Boller] —reacted with alarm, withdrew, and left his circle of advisers.
Instead of uniting Western Christians around himself—and we are not even touching on Orthodoxy here, which is a separate matter—Trump has in effect launched a confrontation with Catholicism. The Pope condemns actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and the war against Iran, and Catholics simply cannot accept the infernal imagery that Trump and his circle disseminate on social media. Around him there seems to be a spreading “black stain” that repels the traditional Christian environment.
From our Orthodox perspective, Catholics themselves have moved far from tradition. Yet even they have not gone as far as Trump’s current circle. It is difficult to describe: whether this is parody and buffoonery, or open possession, or merely a publicity stunt. What we are dealing with under the mask of “Christianity” in the White House is a complete catastrophe.

 I do not know whom they are addressing. Even among evangelicals, Baptists, and Calvinists, this current is an absolute minority. A small, completely deranged Christian Zionist dispensationalist sect has seized influence over Trump’s administration. It is pushing the world toward absurd actions—geopolitically, religiously, and from the standpoint of basic reason. This is not a return to Christianity; it is its complete inversion—a substitution of God with His opposite. [So true. How much Trump is aware of that, and joins the devil, of the zionist-dispensationalists?]
Those demons above Trump, depicted in the image of the Savior—this is something blasphemous. Perhaps they consider it amusing, believing that a “comic-book” format will bring them closer to younger audiences, but I doubt it. What we are dealing with are profound distortions, a final degeneration of Western society. For a long time, they were materialists and atheists, and now they supposedly turn toward faith—but in what form? Everything is inverted, everything is counterfeit. Worse than atheism is outright satanism, which is becoming ever more visible through the American elites.

Host: Incidentally, here satanism has been officially recognized as an extremist movement, which is an important clarification.
But let us turn to geopolitics. We all remember how, just last week, the world stood literally on the brink of the first nuclear strike since Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In the end, the parties did sit down at the negotiating table.
These negotiations lasted twenty-one hours and, to put it mildly, ended unsuccessfully: no consensus was reached. There are even rumors—almost conspiratorial—that Jared Kushner [the cold ultrazionist] nearly came to blows with Iran’s foreign minister. Perhaps this is an exaggeration, but the level of tension was clearly extreme. The most intriguing aspect is Trump’s decision following the meeting: he ordered the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Many people immediately asked a logical question—how can one block something that Iran itself has already effectively blocked? [Possible, and blocks in both ways and will force the explosion...]

Alexander Dugin: As for the negotiations, the first thing to understand is the context. The Americans and the Israelis eliminated Iran’s legitimate leadership and committed a horrific crime in Minab, where 170 innocent schoolgirls were killed. After something like that, no self-respecting country could treat them as a credible party. The fact that Tehran nevertheless agreed, in a rational manner, to hold a meeting was absolutely the right move, and the positions they put forward were nothing short of brilliant.

 The Iranians took a position of strength: “You have committed a crime and must face punishment. We are prepared to discuss a ceasefire, but we will not surrender a single position; on the contrary, we will expand them, since we are the victims of your aggression.” The American side in Islamabad had no choice but to leave empty-handed. It is already remarkable that the Iranians did not carry out their judgment on the spot against Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, who are reasonably accused of involvement in these crimes.[Two monsters] After all, it was they who, during the previous round of negotiations, distracted the Iranian leadership while treacherous strikes were being carried out.
With figures like these, any means become acceptable. Now the only options are either to wait for them to collapse on their own or to find ways to stop them. One thing is clear: this is not a partner with whom agreements can be made or whose commitments can be trusted. In this situation, Iran has demonstrated itself as a true superpower and a genuine builder of a multipolar world. After all the suffering it has endured, the Iranian people have become an embodiment of courage and a moral compass for all humanity. This is a fact that can no longer be ignored.
Morally, they are prevailing. As long as the Iranians hold firm, they only strengthen the moral legitimacy and dignity of their position.
As for Donald Trump: he threatened a nuclear strike, hinted at some kind of “great reset,” and Israel also declared its readiness to use nuclear weapons. Yet Iran remains unyielding, and Trump now has no option left but to attempt to block the Strait of Hormuz from his side.
Washington’s plan is a clever one. In order to reach the open ocean, ships must first pass through an Iranian “customs” regime, which collects fees in rials or yuan. The Americans have now decided to introduce a second layer of blockage: vessels that have already paid the Iranians will be subjected to equivalent American charges upon exit. If the Iranians allow someone through free of charge, the Americans will do the same—but if you have paid Tehran, you will be required to pay the exact same amount to Washington. In theory, this is feasible, since the waters at the exit of the Gulf can be controlled by American naval forces.
In effect, the United States is saying: “If you, the Iranians, intend to control global oil and gas trade, we will block your control.” This is no longer about nuclear weapons, but rather a military-economic maneuver. Let the global economy collapse, let the price of oil soar to $200 per barrel—the Americans do not care, as long as Iran is prevented from taking a key position. This is certainly no Solomon-like decision. In my view, it reflects the logic either of outright aggressors or of geopolitical perverts.

Host: Am I right in understanding that this can already be described as a war of attrition? If at the beginning we observed a hot phase aimed at destruction, are we now seeing attempts to isolate Iran as much as possible, with Washington being completely indifferent to the consequences?

Alexander Dugin: For now, that is exactly how it appears. At the same time, there is nothing to prevent us from assuming that the Americans are using this pause to build up forces in the region—in Qatar and especially in the United Arab Emirates. Their objective would be either to launch a ground operation or to force Iran, by military means, to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. There can be no trust in the United States or Israel: any ceasefire will be used solely in their own interests. [So true, so treacherous, so devilish are USA and Israel governments, reaaly the evil on earth]

Trump’s decision has caused fear and panic among the overwhelming majority of people around the world. Not only did Iran close the strait in response to aggression, but now the Americans have also sealed off those few routes that Iran was willing to leave open in order to ease the energy crisis. It is important to remember that initially Iran imposed no duties at all, and free trade agreements were respected. But after the Americans struck Minab, killing children, and eliminated the country’s military leadership without any justification—simply because Trump wanted to personally control Iranian resources—Tehran had no choice but to defend itself. [The evil of Israel and USA, their criminal nature, has no limits...]
The Iranians began striking at sensitive points: the global economy and U.S. allies in the region. And they achieved results: they began to be taken seriously, they began to be approached with requests. Japan, for example, whose economy critically depends on energy imports, has already agreed to pay Iran in yuan for the passage of ships. And then Trump appears and declares that whatever manages to pass through Iranian barriers will be shut down again. The result is that Europe and the rest of the world—apart from the United States itself—have virtually nowhere left to obtain oil. This amounts to a deliberate escalation toward global economic collapse.

Host: In fact, the situation in Europe is becoming no less dramatic than the Middle Eastern crisis. The energy crisis, which Trump is effectively pushing to a boiling point, is now intersecting with tectonic shifts in European politics. Events in Hungary are already being described as historic: yesterday, April 12, 2026, marked the end of the sixteen-year era of Viktor Orbán.
In elections with a record turnout of nearly 80 percent, the opposition party Tisza Party won, and its leader Péter Magyar secured a constitutional majority. This is a key moment for the entire architecture of the European Union. On the one hand, Magyar has already spoken of “bringing Hungary back to Europe” and of unblocking EU decisions that Budapest had previously stalled, including aid to Ukraine. On the other hand, the reality of resource dependence imposes its own constraints: even the most pro-European politician in Budapest cannot ignore the fact that Hungary’s economy—and the heat in people’s homes—depends directly on Russian energy supplies.
How should we interpret this shift? Péter Magyar is a complex figure: a former ally of Orbán who knows the system from the inside. His rhetoric now balances between loyalty to Brussels and pragmatism. The media note that he promises “caution” on the Ukrainian issue and is in no hurry to sever energy ties with Moscow completely.

Alexander Dugin: All of this must, of course, be placed within the broader context we discussed earlier. First of all, consider this: if the Americans now impose their own second layer of blockage in the Strait of Hormuz, then in practice the maritime delivery of oil to Europe and Asia from the Arabian Peninsula will cease. It will fall either to zero or to negligible levels. At the same time, Russia could be the primary supplier of energy resources to Europe. But here EU sanctions and pressure from Trump come into play, discouraging the purchase of Russian oil, along with Europe’s own abandonment of a rational approach.
In this regard, the most clear-headed politician was Orbán. He insisted that without Russian oil, there would be no economy at all. He was a pragmatist—not necessarily a great supporter of Russia, but a conservative who approached us without prejudice and understood that Hungary needs oil from somewhere in order to survive. And now it simply is not available. Moreover, the Ukrainian regime has already carried out sabotage attacks on Russian pipelines, causing a scandal in an earlier phase, and intends to continue doing so. Recently, Ukrainian operatives were caught attempting to blow up the TurkStream. Their aim is to deprive Europe entirely of energy supplies from Russia. At the same time, painful strikes are being carried out against our energy infrastructure and ports.
As a result, Russia may either be unwilling or technically and legally unable to supply resources. Oil from the Middle East is effectively disappearing from the global economy. Russia is being blocked—both by its own decisions and by external pressure: if war is being waged against us, why should we continue to supply them? And then Trump comes forward and says: “But we have plenty of oil.” I recently read a serious analysis: the United States does indeed have substantial oil reserves, but they are barely sufficient to meet its own needs. For America to take responsibility for other economies—for Europe, Japan, India, or China—and say “buy from us,” it would need a surplus. That surplus does not exist.
The United States itself may suffer less than others, but it does not have the volumes required for global trade. Moreover, rising oil prices will inevitably disrupt processes within the American economy, which are already under strain. Trump is now effectively undermining not only the global system, but also the foundations of his own prosperity. The question arises: why? Does he not have advisers capable of explaining that U.S. resources are sufficient only to cover domestic demand? If we add to this Iran’s resilience and the situation in Venezuela, it becomes clear that we are witnessing a massive, fatal, and unstoppable collapse of the global economy in the broadest sense.

Host: Returning to Hungary: what will fundamentally change with the rise of Péter Magyar? If we were to summarize it in a few key points, what shifts in the country’s policy will be most decisive under current conditions?

Alexander Dugin: It is difficult to give a definitive answer. In fact, if one closely examines Magyar’s campaign, he did not differ all that much from Orbán in his basic principles. Incidentally, he was quite critical of Volodymyr Zelenskyy and spoke directly about the need to maintain relations with Russia. However, he was elected primarily because of his pro-European orientation.
For now, I would refrain from drawing final conclusions. Magyar will inevitably disappoint either his voters or the European elites who supported him. He will certainly let someone down, and at that point a political crisis in the country will resume with renewed intensity.
It is impossible to predict the outcome in advance: either he will betray the expectations of those who voted for a continuation of a pragmatic line toward Russia and Ukraine (albeit in a different form), or he will disappoint the forces within the European Union that saw him as a compliant instrument of Brussels. His position is extremely unstable.»
Translated from the Russian, for Alexander Dugin substack, and transcribed from there for this blog. 15/4/26. Much light and love, or Logos in everyone and all.

Alexander Dugin: Uma Civilização contra si própria. A Civilization Against Itself. USA. Português, English.

 Mais um valioso texto do notável filósofo e geo-estrategista, em que desenha os contornos dinamicos do conflito actual e os grupos e poderes essencias e inteligências, com suas aspirações e dominações em luta. Com grande lucidez e claridade, Alexande Dugin tira um bomretrato dos USA e a da União Europeia e da luta de morte da hegemonia impiedosa que pretendem manter contra a humanidade multipolar que, liderada pelo Irão, a Rússia, a China, Cuba, Burkina Fasso, entre outros,  tenta libertar-se de tal opressão da elite epsteiniana, trumpista, sionista.... 

                         

Alexander Dugin
Uma Civilização Contra Si Mesma

Por trás da loucura de Trump, podemos ler o plano B do globalismo: a destruição da humanidade como o preço a pagar para se manter o controle pela elite ocidental. Abril 09, 2026

A luta dos evangélicos dispensacionalistas (administração Trump) contra a Igreja Católica é a fase final da Reforma radical.[ Dugin preveu o ataque de Trump ao Papa Leão X] Muitas pontas soltas que não foram resolvidas no século XVII reaparecem agora. Quinta Monarquia [Um projecto inglês e judaico, semelhante ao V Império. Ferando Pessoa trabalhou muito o V Império, a partir do sonho de Daniel mas refere também a Quinta Monarquia, e ambos são formas de dominio total de uma religião ou ideologia]. Essa é a chave. E Sabbatai Zevi [1626-1676, um falso messias turco judeu], claro.

O socialismo tornou a empatia e a compaixão obrigatórias, muito formais. Mas se não tiveres essa qualidade,  não és humano. A ironia calvinista de Elon Musk sobre empatia é moralmente repugnante. Em Trump, vemos como o egoísmo e o narcisismo são malignos, cruéis e horríveis. [Dois sociopatas, na sua falta de empatia e fraternidade, com as consequências terríveis que podem ter nos outros ao serem milionários poderosos]

Ayn Rand [1905-1982, filósofa anti-religiosa e anti-altruísta] e sua "filosofia" são puro satanismo. É o manifesto das elites de Epstein. Mas não é algo marginal. É a própria essência do capitalismo ocidental (principalmente anglo-saxão). Werner Sombart (1863-1941, economista, sociólogo] explicou minuciosamente a gênese do capitalismo e sua ligação com a usura.

Cada vez mais é evidente que os EUA precisam urgentemente de um terceiro partido (movimento, corrente). Nem o globalismo liberal de esquerda [isto é, a esquerda do Partido Democrata que tem algo de uma mera social democracia mas ao serviço do imperialismo], nem o trumpismo satano-calvinista [televangelista de Paula White e &] e sionista [bem patente no zelota ou fanático impiedoso Pete Hegset, que até o Papa Leão X teve de o criticar; e que diferença de vibrações entre estes...]. Com ideologia, filosofia, sociologia, história das religiões, moral e economia especiais. [Uma magna tarefa, impossível claramente...]

O cristianismo no Ocidente é apenas uma dor fantasma [ainda que haja ainda dinamismos fraternos e altruístas fortes na juventude]. Foi obliterado há muito tempo com a Modernidade baseada na ciência materialista, no ateísmo, no individualismo, na democracia e no capitalismo. A Modernidade transformou o Ocidente em uma civilização não cristã e anti-cristã.

Há uma espécie de plano geopolítico nas sombras do óbvio delírio da América trumpista. É a estratégia para salvar a unipolaridade [ou opressiva hegemonia do capitalismo ocidental do Fórum Económico Social, de George Soros, dos Rothschild] pelos meios mais drásticos: genocídio em massa, Terceira Guerra Mundial, armas nucleares, múltiplas intervenções, provocando guerras regionais simultâneas. [Tão evidentemente perpetrado pelos USA e NATO...] Outros meios estão esgotados.

Por trás da loucura de Trump, podemos ler o plano B do globalismo: a destruição da humanidade como o preço pago pelo controle da elite ocidental. É a lógica do globalismo duro, impiedoso [hardcore]. O liberalismo foi esmagado por causa de sua «empatia» (hipócrita) e obsessão wokeista [não há identidade, nem nacionalidades, nem géneros, nem religiões, nem tradições: globalidade por baixo...]

Tudo está estruturado em torno do dilema da unipolaridade versus multipolaridade. O Ocidente sacrificou a sua identidade, cultura, tradições e valores por uma coisa: o poder global. Teve isso durante o momento unipolar (1989-agora). Mas começou a rachar.

O Ocidente considerou que ainda poderia ter o poder global sacrificando cada vez mais sua identidade (plano globalista liberal). O plano de Trump/Israel é reafirmar a identidade ocidental (sionista/sionista cristão) com uma luta desesperada para conservar sua força e hegemonia. Ambos Impossíveis.

A multipolaridade é a única e exclusiva saída para a situação. Você poderia conservar a América e/ou a Europa apenas compartilhando o poder global com outros Polos. Vocês não podem ficar com tudo para vocês. Não mais. A Terceira Guerra Mundial é sobre isso.
Os EUA estão nas mãos de um louco cruel. A UE é a junta de globalistas depravados e insanos. Os líderes pró-Ocidente são palhaços, loucos e maníacos patéticos. O retrato coletivo do Ocidente actual é realmente um desastre total. Nada atraente. Repulsivo. E o futuro promete piorar.»

                                       

Alexander Dugin

A Civilization Against Itself

Behind Trump’s madness we can read the plan B of the globalism: the destruction of the humanity as the price paid for the control of the western elite.
abr 09, 2026

The fight of the evangelicals dispensationalists (Trump’s administration) against Catholic Church is the end stage of the radical Reform. Many odd ends that weren’t solved in 17 century reappear now. Fifth Monarchy. That is the key. And Sabbatai Zevi of course.

The socialism made the empathy and compassion obligatory, too formal. But if you have no such quality you aren’t human. The Calvinist irony of Elon Musk about empathy is morally disgusting. In Trump we watch how evil, cruel and horrible the egocentrism and narcissism look like.

Ayn Rand and her “philosophy” is pure satanism. It is the manifesto of Epstein elites. But it is not something marginal. It is the very essence of the western (mostly Anglo-Saxon) capitalism. Sombart has explained thoroughly the genesis of the capitalism and its link to usury.

More and more it is evident that the U.S. badly needs third party (movement, current). Neither left liberal globalist, nor satano-Calvinist and Zionist trumpism. With special ideology, philosophy, sociology, history of religions, moral and economy.

The Christianity in the West is just a phantom pain. It was obliterated long long ago with the Modernity based on the materialist science, atheism, individualism, democracy and capitalism. The Modernity has transformed the West into non-Christian anti- Christian civilisation.

There is some geopolitical plan in the shadow of the obvious delirium of trumpist America. It is the strategy to save the unipolarity by the hardest means: mass genocide, WWIII, nuke, multiple interventions, provoking simultaneous regional wars. Other means are exhausted.

Behind Trump’s madness we can read the plan B of the globalism: the destruction of the humanity as the price paid for the control of the western elite. It is hardcore globalism rationale. The liberalism was crushed because of its (hypocritical) «empathy» and wokeist obsession.

Everything is structured around unipolarity versus multipolarity dilemma. The West has sacrificed its identity, culture, traditions, values for one thing global power. It had it during unipolar moment (1989-now). But it began to crack.

The West deemed that it could still have the global power sacrificing more and more its identity (liberal globalist plan). Trump/Israel plan is to reaffirm Western (Zionist/Christian Zionist) identity with desperate fight to conserve its strength and hegemony. Both Impassible. [Or, surely, Impossible]

The multipolarity is the unique and only exit of the situation. You could conserve America and/or Europe only sharing the global power with other Poles. You can’t keep it all for yourselves. Not anymore. The WWIII is about that.

The U.S. is in the hand of cruel madman. EU is the junta of deranged pervert globalists. Pro-Western leaders are clowns, crazy and pathetic maniacs. The collective portrait of the actual West is really total disaster. Nothing attractive. Repulsive. And the future promises worse.»

 

Trump ataca o Papa Leo X, apoiado por Paula White, Hegseth e outros zelotas, mas é rebatido luminosamente. Em actualização.

                                                               

Com um dos seus mais recentes desmandos, o orgulhoso, e quem sabe se já semi-demente, presidente norte-americano Donald Trump abriu mais uma frente na sua batalha megalomaníaca pelo húbrico domínio do planeta, não se satisfazendo com a Venezuela e o Irão, ou a Gronelândia e Cuba, ou mesmo a China, mas apontando as suas baterias de tweets ao papa Leão X que, na sua missão de pontífice, de qutb ou polo divino, mediador e pacificador, tem nos seus últimos discursos apelado à paz e reprovado as guerras ("as mãos cheias de sangue") pronunciando-se de uma forma serena, diplomática e católica, no seu sentido etimológico de universalista, ainda que criticando expressamente as ameaças de Trump, e feitas no Domingo de Páscoa, de destruir a civilização iraniana em horas ou dias...

Na sua natureza despótica Donald Trump não gostou e ao anoitecer do dia 12 resolveu atacá-lo directamente, e indirectamente a Igreja Católica com os seus já mais de um bilião de fiéis, com o seguinte tweet: 

«O Papa Leão é FRACO quanto ao Crime, e terrível para a Política Externa. Ele fala do "medo" face à Administração Trump, mas não menciona o MEDO que a Igreja Católica, e todas as outras Organizações Cristãs, tiveram durante o COVID quando eles estavam a prender sacerdotes, ministros e qualquer tipo de gente, por realizarem serviços públicos, mesmo quando saíam e as pessoas estavam separadas entre si dez a vinte pés. Eu gosto muito mais do seu irmão Luís do que dele porque o seu irmão é todo MAGA [do movimento popular Make America Great Again]. Ele percebe tal, enquanto o seu irmão não. Não quero um Papa que pense que está tudo certo (OK) em o Irão ter uma arma nuclear. Não quero um Papa que pense que é terrível a América ter atacado a Venezuela, um país que estava a enviar quantidades maciças de drogas para os USA e, ainda pior, a esvaziar as suas prisões de criminosos, de negociantes de drogas e de assassinos, para o nosso País [Fosse verídico tal ou não, nada mudou senão prenderem o presidente Maduro e controlarem algo do seu óleo]. Eu não quero um Papa que critica o Presidente dos Estados Unidos por eu estar a fazer exactamente aquilo para que fui eleito, numa VOTAÇÃO MACIÇA (LANDSLIDE), estabelecendo recordes de Números Baixos no Crime e criando o Maior Mercado da Bolsa da História. Leo deve estar grato porque, como toda a gente sabe, ele foi um surpresa que  chocou muito. Ele não estava em qualquer lista para ser Papa, e foi posto nela pela Igreja porque ele era um americano e pensaram que seria a melhor maneira para tratarem (deal) com o Presidente Donald Trump. Se eu não estivesse na Casa Branca, Leo não estaria no Vaticano. Desafortunadamente Leo é fraco em Crime, Fraco em Armas Nucleares, não se senta bem comigo, nem o facto de que ele se dá com simpatizantes de Obama, tal como David Axelrod [n. 1954, principal estrategista da vitória de Obama, mas igualmente um imperialista], um PERDEDOR da Esquerda, que era um dos que queria que os fiéis e os clérigos fossem presos. Leo deve ter os seus actos juntos como Papa, não como político, usar o seu senso comum, parar de nutrir a esquerda radical [Para Trump, tudo o que é do partido democrático é esquerda, quando de socialismo integro nada tem, e apenas pode ser o do socialismo epsteiniano e do Soros.], e focar-se em ser um bom Papa e não um Político.  (Isso) está a feri-lo muito mal, e, mais importante, está a ferir a Igreja Católica! Presidente Donald J. Trump.»

 

 

 Quanto desta mensagem foi escrita por Trump, talvez se conseguisse saber, se fosse conhecido com quem estava às 8 da noite, mas pouco importa pois o texto tem as marcas inconfundíveis da sua loucura narcisista de querer ser o melhor em tudo, de depreciar ou atacar constantemente os seus competidores ou rivais, e recorrer a todo o tipo de exageros e mentiras para justificar os seus actos ou garantir as proezas que apregoa. 

O mais grave da carta é a insinuação que o consistório cardinalício, a mais alta representatividade grupal da igreja, se moveu por interesses de negociar (deal) bem com Trump, e não pela inspiração da inteligência divina ou Espírito santo, quando  elegeu um cardeal americano. É muito grave esta acusação, e provém claramente de um homem corrupto e que corrompeu muita gente, para não falarmos dos outros crimes de que é acusado e que parecem ser uma das causas destes comportamentos tão trágicos para tanta gente que vai morrendo ou ficando ferida e traumatizada para sempre.  Anote-se no sentido de ser falsa ou pelo menos exagerada tal afirmação, segundo o que ele escreveu em tweet após a eleição: «Que emoção, e que Grande Honra para o nosso País. Estou ansioso por conhecer o Papa Leão XIV. Será um momento muito significativo!» Como mudou ou degenerou violentamente Donald Trump, provavelmente chantageado pelos donos dos vídeos de Epstein...

As reacções não se fizeram esperar, naturalmente na sua grande maioria críticas, embora haja ainda muitos evangelistas, zelotas, sionistas e MAGA alienados da verdade e da justiça e cegos pelas manipulações a que foram submetidos.

Pete Hegseth, o secretário de Defesa, um fanático sionista-evangelista, e que pediu logo de início aos seus militares "uma guerra sem piedade nem regras", que pode ter cooperado na escrita do Tweet, tendo atrás de si um dos seus mentores, o político ultra-sionista do Pentágono, Norm Coleman.

  Já quanto ao que a sua papisa, ou mais precisamente conselheira religiosa da Casa Branca, Paula White terá declarado quanto a esta controvérsia não sabemos mas ela é certamente uma das responsáveis destas atrocidades megalomaníacas religiosas, já que no Domingo de Pascoa, diante dele e numa cerimónia religiosa, comparou Trump a Jesus, pois igualmente tivera o seu caminho de sofrimento e ressurreição.

                               

Paula White, embora tente lavar o seu passado e o seu interior falso, com um belo site e actividades humanitárias, pode ser vista em muitos vídeos no Rumble ou no Youtube em acção nos seus exorcismos, pregações e vendas de bênçãos, ao estilo de vendedor de banha de cobra. Vale a pena ver alguns deles, tal este, em que o Presidente da Trinity Foundation, o sábio Ole Anthony, verbera a ganância dos pregadores evangelistas e em especial televangelistas norte-americanos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYE5Lipyh_Q

                                            

Um analista político conhecido e sábio, Larry Sabato (n. 1952), denunciou bem Trump, escrevendo no X: «diz Trump: "Eu não quero um Papa que..." Que monumental arrogância. Lembrem-se do tweet que Trump publicou apresentando-se como Papa? Esse é o Pontífice que esse vanglorioso super-narcisista vaidoso quer.»

Doze horas depois de a ter publicado, Trump retirou-a. Fazia-se de Jesus,  de um líder carismático, um novo Messias, ou apenas dum médico e curador? E quem é o doente? Um militar agressor ferido, ou um ser que ele está a ungir na morte?

 Também, como noticia o excelente site Occupy Democrats, o bispo norte-americano Robert Barron, até agora apoiante de Trump, resolveu não abafar a sua consciência ética e partilhar antes muito bem a sua sabedoria moral: «as afirmações feitas pelo Presidente Trump na Truth Social quanto ao Papa são inteiramente desapropriadas e desrespeitosas. Não contribuem de modo algum para uma conversa construtiva. É uma prerrogativa do Papa articular a doutrina católica e os princípios que governam a vida moral. Quanto às aplicações concretas desses princípios, as pessoas de boa vontade podem concordar ou discordar. Penso que o Presidente deve pedir desculpas ao Papa.» 

                                      

Todavia, pelo contrário, o narcisista e orgulhoso presidente voltou a denegrir o Papa com a sua visão distorcida de quem o Papa é e o que ele defende (acusando-o de defender o Crime, ele, Trump, com o Netanyahu, os criminosos-móres actuais], não querendo reconhecê-lo como um eco ou porta voz de Jesus Cristo na Terra.

Todavia são muitas as vozes dentro e fora da Igreja, que se juntam às dos grande analistas geoestratégicos, a condenarem a megalomania sociopata de Trump. 

                                      

Por exemplo:  O arcebispo Paul Coakley, de Oklahoma City, presidente da Conferência dos Bispos Católicos dos EUA, emitiu uma das primeiras respostas públicas, expressando decepção com o tom das observações dirigidas ao pontífice. "Estou desanimado que o Presidente tenha escolhido escrever palavras tão depreciativas sobre o Santo Padre. O Papa Leão não é seu rival; nem o Papa é um político.  Ele é o Vigário de Cristo que fala a partir da verdade do Evangelho e para o cuidado das almas."

                                        

 Entretanto o Papa Leão X, ao partir para a sua 1ª viagem a África de doze dias, não se coibiu de exercer o seu magistério ético e moral e respondeu assim, como um meio de comunicação estrangeiro, a  Associated Press, noticiou:

 «O Papa Leão XIV respondeu na segunda-feira, dizendo à Associated Press,  a bordo do avião papal a caminho da Argélia, que os apelos do Vaticano pela paz e reconciliação estão enraizados no Evangelho, e que ele não teme a administração Trump. "Colocar minha mensagem no mesmo nível do que o presidente tentou fazer acho que é não entender qual é a mensagem do Evangelho. E lamento ouvir isso, mas continuarei com o que acredito ser a missão da igreja no mundo de hoje."
                                           
O primeiro papa nascido nos Estados Unidos na história enfatizou que não estava a fazer um ataque direto contra Trump ou qualquer outra pessoa com seu apelo geral pela paz e críticas à "ilusão de omnipotência" que está alimentando as guerras no Irão e outros conflitos ao redor do mundo.
"Não entrarei em debate." As coisas que digo certamente não são destinadas a atacar ninguém. A mensagem do Evangelho é muito clara: 'Bem-aventurados os pacificadores'," disse Leo.
"Não vou hesitar em anunciar a mensagem do Evangelho e convidar todas as pessoas a procurarem os modos de se construirem pontes de paz e reconciliação, e de se evitar a guerra sempre que possível".

Será que esta polémica terá efeitos benéficos na exposição mundial da demência de Trump e dos seus conselheiros, com efeitos quem sabe de suscitar mais desagrado ou mesmo desobediência civil ética  de militares e políticos contra a sua tão desgraçada e violenta presidência?  Esperemos que sim e que o Irão, o Líbano, o Yemen, o Iraque e a Venezuela não tenham que sofrer mais o espezinhamento e bombardeamento por via de tais diabólicos políticos sionistas imperialistas...

 P.S. Já no dia 14 um bom canal informativo, Democracy Now, publicou uma esclarecedor reportagem sobre o caso, informando que Trump, devido a protestos, retirara a imagem polémica ao fim de 12 horas e que depois respondera a jornalistas afirmando que apenas se retratara como um médico. Mais patético ainda é o Vice-presidente Vance, um católico, vir aconselhar o Papa a se limitar à moral e à Igreja e não se imiscuir na política, deixando isso para [o louco] Trump. Já o sacerdote jesuíta James Martin critica expressamente Paula White como uma idólatra e que, com o incitador da impiedade total Pete Hegseth, perverte os ensinamentos evangélicos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lS4__fG0kGs.

Já no dia 15, quando  se generalizaram as reacções contra a megalomania invejosa e violenta de Donald Trump (ser o único galo ou touro na praça, provavelmente), as críticas corajosas das duas líderes políticas italianas, Giorgia Melloni e Elly Schlein, certamente irradiaram energias poderosas no sentido de diminuírem a opressiva liderança de Trump, tanto no caso do Irão e sua sagrada civilização como no respeito pelo Papa, a Igreja e a soberania italiana... Vejamos se Trump consegue pôr as rédeas a si próprio. O canal Occupy Democrats, através do bem irónico Anthony Vincent Gallo, fez uma boa reportagem que pode ver e vibrar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeyoW33YPYQ

Acrescente-se, a 17, para finalizar que Trump e o próprio dito católico (provavelmente convertido com interesses políticos) Vance, além do fanático sionizado Pete Hegseth mantiveram uma posição condenatória do magistério moral ou ético do Papa, e que este já em África, com grande serenidade conhecimento de causa, diante de muito público e atento, pronunciou-se contra os violentos e arrogantes, com claras indirectas aos governantes norte-americanos. O Papa Leão X demonstrou que, não por influência trumpiana, mas pela Providencia divina é que foi erguido a Papa, pois agora há uma voz sã e sabia que brota por entre a generalizada hubris (arrogância desmedidad) norte americana, e que no actual governo se manifesta demasiado degenerada ou diabolizada mesmo...

Alexandre Dugin. Géopolitique de la troisième guerre mondiale. 9/4/26, dans https://www.geopolitika.ru

Alexandre Dugin continua diariamente a dialogar em entrevistas, ou a escrever para alguns espaços da web, transmitindo a sua clara visão da luta do capitalismo globalista e sionista contra a multipolaridade, ou contra os países que se lhe opõem. Eis um texto publicado a 9 de Abril, na versão francesa, no valioso site https://www.geopolitika.ru

 Alexandre Douguine

«De nombreux analystes avancent actuellement l’hypothèse que la troisième guerre mondiale a déjà commencé et que nous en sommes à sa première phase. Que ce soit vrai ou non, nous le saurons dans un avenir proche, mais supposons pour l’instant que cette hypothèse est fondée et tentons d’en examiner les contours géopolitiques.
La signification de la troisième guerre mondiale réside dans un changement radical de toute l’architecture de la politique mondiale. Les institutions internationales existantes depuis longtemps ne correspondent plus à la réalité. Elles sont toujours structurées selon la logique du système de Westphalie et du monde bipolaire. Le modèle de Westphalie repose sur la reconnaissance de la souveraineté de tous les États reconnus au niveau international. L’ONU est bâtie sur le même principe.
Cependant, dans la pratique, au cours des cent dernières années, le principe de souveraineté est devenu une pure hypocrisie. Dans les années 1930, en Europe, un système s’était formé où seuls trois forces étaient souveraines, et de manière strictement idéologique : 1) l’Occident bourgeois-capitaliste (Grande-Bretagne, États-Unis, France, etc.) ; 2) l’URSS communiste ; 3) les pays de l’Axe, avec une idéologie fasciste.
Une telle situation a perduré après la fin de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, mais un seul de ces pôles idéologiques — le fasciste — a disparu. Cependant, les deux autres — capitaliste et socialiste — se sont renforcés et étendus. Mais là encore, aucun État-nation en soi n’était souverain. Certains étaient dirigés depuis Moscou, d’autres depuis Washington. Le mouvement de non-alignement oscillait entre ces deux pôles.
L’auto-dissolution du Pacte de Varsovie et l’effondrement de l’URSS ont éliminé le bipolarisme, et à partir de ce moment, seul les États-Unis ont été porteurs de la souveraineté. L’ONU et le modèle de Westphalie sont devenus de simples paravents de l’hégémonie mondiale. Ainsi est apparu un monde unipolaire.
Dès les années 1990, il est devenu évident qu’il fallait revoir le droit international au profit soit d’un gouvernement mondial (version libérale de la fin de l’histoire selon Francis Fukuyama), soit d’une hégémonie occidentale directe (les néoconservateurs américains). Les pays européens ont suivi le scénario du gouvernement mondial, en cédant leur souveraineté en faveur de l’UE, en tant qu’étape préparatoire à celui-ci. À leur tour, il a été suggéré discrètement à tous les autres de se préparer à la même chose.
Cependant, au début des années 2000, une nouvelle tendance a émergé: la volonté de restaurer la souveraineté en Russie et en Chine. Moscou et Pékin ont tendu vers la réalisation de la souveraineté non plus comme une fiction, mais comme une réalité. C’est ainsi que la multipolarité s’est manifestée. Désormais, il était proposé que les porteurs de la souveraineté deviennent des États-civilisations — aussi bien déjà constitués (Russie, Chine, Inde) que potentiels (monde islamique, Afrique, Amérique latine). Et c’est ainsi qu’ils se sont constitués en BRICS.
En conséquence — le projet unipolaire est entré en collision avec le multipolaire. Tant les globalistes que les néoconservateurs s’opposaient au multipolarisme. Le potentiel de conflit était évident, et les anciennes normes et règles, encore issues des périodes géopolitiques précédentes, n’étaient plus applicables.
Il n’importe pas de savoir si la troisième guerre mondiale a déjà commencé ou non, mais sa teneur géopolitique est claire : c’est une guerre entre l’unipolarité et le multipolarisme pour une nouvelle architecture mondiale, pour la répartition des centres de décision souverains — soit uniquement à l’Ouest, soit parmi les États-civilisations en pleine montée en puissance.
Donald Trump est arrivé à la Maison-Blanche pour un second mandat en 2024 avec un programme qui laissait penser qu’il adopterait le multipolarisme: refus des interventions, critique des globalistes, conflit direct avec les libéraux, attaques virulentes contre les néoconservateurs, concentration sur les problèmes intérieurs des États-Unis, appel à revenir aux valeurs traditionnelles — tout cela laissait penser que Trump et son administration prendraient partie pour le multipolarisme, tout en cherchant à assurer aux États-Unis des positions aussi avantageuses que possible dans cette nouvelle configuration.
Cependant, très vite, l’administration américaine a commencé à se rapprocher des néoconservateurs et à s’éloigner de sa position initiale. Par la suite, elle a soutenu le génocide à Gaza, poursuivi l’approvisionnement de Kiev en renseignements, capturé Maduro, préparé une invasion de Cuba, et enfin déclaré la guerre à l’Iran avec l’assassinat des dirigeants politiques de la République islamique d’Iran.
La troisième guerre mondiale a été déclenchée par les États-Unis dans le contexte de la préservation, du renforcement et même de l’affirmation définitive du modèle unipolaire de l’ordre mondial. On propose à tous les autres d’être soit des vassaux obéissants, soit des ennemis. C’est avec ces adversaires du monde unipolaire que Washington mène cette troisième guerre mondiale. En jeu, il y a la souveraineté. Il n’existe pas encore une seule puissance capable de faire face de manière symétrique aux États-Unis, c’est pourquoi ceux-ci déploient des actions militaires sur plusieurs fronts simultanément.
Le premier front de cette guerre du monde unipolaire contre un monde multipolaire est l’Ukraine. Cette guerre a été provoquée par les néocons dès l’époque d’Obama, et ce sont surtout les globalistes qui y ont pris part, voyant en la Russie non seulement un obstacle géopolitique à l’établissement d’un gouvernement mondial, mais aussi une menace idéologique. Trump a hérité cette guerre, et il ne s’en réjouit pas vraiment (la Russie étant une puissance nucléaire avec une idéologie conservatrice, contre laquelle le président américain n’a rien à redire). Mais Moscou n’est manifestement pas prête à reconnaître sa vassalité envers Washington, insistant sur la souveraineté et la multipolarité, ce qui est incompatible avec l’hégémonie unipolaire. Quoi qu’il en soit, Washington continue de soutenir le régime de Kiev, tout en transférant l’initiative aux pays européens de l’OTAN, pour lesquels ce conflit revêt un caractère à la fois essentiel et idéologique. Ce front demeure important, et plus Moscou défend sa souveraineté, plus Washington sera dur avec la Russie.
Le deuxième front des États-Unis concerne l’hémisphère occidental: l’enlèvement de Maduro et la prise de contrôle du Venezuela, la préparation d’une invasion de Cuba, des actions contre les cartels au Mexique, en Colombie, en Équateur, etc. En substance, c’est une guerre contre toute l’Amérique latine dès lors qu’un pays tente de résister au diktat direct des États-Unis.
Le troisième front, actuellement à la phase la plus intense, est l’attaque israélo-américaine contre l’Iran, qui a enflamé tout le Moyen-Orient. Cela inclut également la poursuite des opérations militaires de Tel-Aviv à Gaza, au Liban, au Yémen, ainsi que la refonte de toute la carte du Moyen-Orient.
En substance, l’Occident mène actuellement une guerre simultanée contre trois pôles du monde multipolaire (Russie, monde islamique, Amérique latine). À l’ordre du jour, l’ouverture d’un quatrième front — dans le Pacifique. Le conflit avec la Chine est inévitable selon la logique globale des changements en cours dans la politique mondiale.
L’Inde — un autre État-civilisation — adopte encore une position fluctuante et, en raison des contradictions avec la Chine et le Pakistan, penche vers les États-Unis et Israël. Mais pour jouer le rôle de vassal docile, l’Inde, avec son potentiel, ne semble guère adaptée, d’autant plus que la multipolarité constitue la ligne officielle de son gouvernement.
Ainsi, la carte de la géopolitique de la troisième guerre mondiale est esquissée dans ses grandes lignes. La faction du monde unipolaire y est représentée par les États-Unis, l’Occident dans son ensemble et leurs vassaux, y compris le Japon et la Corée du Sud en Extrême-Orient. Ils se battent selon deux scénarios qui ne sont pas totalement identiques: le mondialisme (l’UE et le Parti démocrate des États-Unis) et l’hégémonie américaine directe (les néocons).
Par ailleurs, Netanyahu a dans cette configuration ses propres plans autonomes pour la construction d’un grand Israël, ce qui est difficilement conciliable avec le mondialisme libéral, mais tout à fait soutenu par la Maison-Blanche, les néocons et les chrétiens sionistes. Cependant, dans l’ensemble, cette coalition reste relativement solidaire face au monde multipolaire et, à mesure que l’escalade augmente, elle sera contrainte d’agir de plus en plus de manière unie, en laissant les contradictions internes pour plus tard.
Le camp du monde multipolaire est beaucoup plus dispersé. Ses principaux centres sont la Russie et la Chine. La Russie mène déjà sa guerre en Ukraine, tandis que la Chine évite pour l’instant une confrontation directe. Le monde islamique est divisé, une partie des pays musulmans étant sous contrôle total des États-Unis. L’Iran et le monde chiite en général sont les plus radicaux, ils sont en première ligne de la confrontation contre l’Occident, mais les Iraniens ne comprennent pas encore totalement que d’autres fronts de cette guerre, notamment l’Ukraine, les touchent directement.
La direction de la RPD Chine comprend parfaitement la situation géopolitique globale, étant la plus ouverte à soutenir la Russie dans la confrontation contre l’Occident sur le front ukrainien.
L’Amérique latine est également fragmentée. Le gouvernement de Lula au Brésil penche vers la multipolarité, tandis que le régime de Milei en Argentine soutient, au contraire, l’axe américano-israélien.
En Afrique, la multipolarité est la plus fortement ressentie par les pays de l’Association du Sahel (Mali, Burkina Faso et Niger). La position leur est proche, tout comme celle de l’Afrique du Sud, de la Centrafrique, de l’Éthiopie et de certains autres pays. Mais aucun d’eux ne possède une position consolidée.
L’Inde adopte une position neutre — d’un côté, en tant que membre du bloc multipolaire, et de l’autre, en raison de ses relations étroites avec les États-Unis et Israël.
Globalement, les forces unipolaires, malgré toutes leurs contradictions internes, sont plus consolidées et ont une vision plus claire de contre qui, pour quels intérêts et quelles valeurs elles combattent. La divergence de priorités et même de visions sur le modèle final de l’ordre mondial souhaité par l’Occident — les États-Unis — ne constitue pas un obstacle à leur stratégie commune, à leur coopération étroite dans le domaine du renseignement, à l’échange de technologies militaires, etc.
De leur côté, le camp multipolaire est beaucoup plus dispersé. Même les pays directement attaqués par l’Occident unipolaire ne se précipitent pas pour intégrer leur potentiel ni pour soutenir directement les autres.»

Alexandre Dugin. 

On espere que les membres plus forts du BRICS manifestent plus dynamiquemente l'unité du project si desirée par l'Humanitéet soutiennent plus ceux qui sont attaqués par USA, Israel e NATO.